Trump, who viewed climate change as a scam and removed dozens of environmental rules to protect the environment and fight climate change, decided to leave the international agreement early in his term. However, as the agreement does not allow countries to formally begin the withdrawal process until three years after its entry into force, the one-year process officially began on 4 November 2019. All remaining parties to the agreement must present their new 2030 targets before the next major UN climate meeting to be held in Glasgow, UK, in November 2021 (this year`s climate summit has been postponed due to the pandemic). To date, only 14 revised targets have been proposed or tabled. Even if the Paris Agreement were fully implemented, with full respect for all nations, it is estimated that it would produce only two-tenths of a degree – remember; so much – Celsius drops in global temperature by the year 2100. Small and small quantity. In fact, 14 days of carbon emissions from China alone would cancel out U.S. profits — and this is an incredible statistic — would completely negate the benefits of the cuts expected from the U.S. in 2030, after having to spend billions and billions of dollars, lose jobs, shut down factories, and suffer much higher energy costs for our businesses and homes. Niklas Höhne, a climate scientist and founder of the New Climate Institute in Germany, said Turkey was “outside” the list of countries that have yet to ratify the agreement. The White House has said that Trump will end the implementation of the carbon reduction targets set by former President Barack Obama and that the withdrawal will be done in accordance with the withdrawal process that has lasted for years, as defined in the agreement.
 On September 16, 2017, a European official said that the Trump administration had weakened its position on withdrawing from the agreement. The White House told reporters it had not changed its position on the deal.   For international climate leaders, the “real power” is to have the United States as an ally, beyond the significant emission reductions it could make domestically, in its ability to use investment and other financial resources to advance the fight against climate change in other countries, Light says. And as a major investor in development banks like the World Bank and the Regional Development Bank, the United States can also use its influence to stop investment in fossil fuels, as the European Development Bank has done. You say that states and cities will help reduce U.S. emissions by 19% compared to 2025 compared to 2005 – that`s not enough to offset the U.S. promise under Paris, but it keeps those goals “at hand.” If the obstructionists want to meet me, let`s make them non-obstructionists. We will all sit down and we will resume the agreement. .