Captain Ellen Kiel: If none of us get this trade deal, it`s your fault. Captain Evon Slot Blade: My fault? You`re a mouse fart who thinks she`s a hurricane. Please. Captain Ellen Kiel: Oh yes? It`s not beautiful anymore. You`re coming down, Gnashblade. Captain Evon Gnashblade: (Chuckle) Stay by Ellen`s side so as not to hurt your feelings A ceasefire is a formal agreement of the belligerents to end the fighting. This is not necessarily the end of a war, because it can only represent a cessation of hostilities while trying to negotiate a lasting peace. It is derived from the Latin arma, which means “weapons” (as in weapons) and stitium, which means “a stop.”  A ceasefire is a modus vivendi and not the same as a peace treaty whose agreement can take months or even years. The 1953 ceasefire agreement is an important example of a ceasefire that was not followed by a peace treaty. A ceasefire is also different from a ceasefire or ceasefire that involves a temporary cessation of hostilities for an agreed limited time or within a demarcated area.
A ceasefire may be needed to negotiate a ceasefire. Under international law, a ceasefire is a legal agreement (often in a document) that puts an end to fighting between the “belligerents” of war or conflict.  In the Hague Convention of 1899, in which three treaties were concluded and three declarations were made, the Convention on the Laws and Customs of War in Rural Areas established that “if the duration of the ceasefire is not fixed”, the parties can resume fighting (Article 36) at their convenience, but with correct communications. It is a “fixed-term” ceasefire, where the parties can only renew the fighting at the end of their fixed duration. If the belligerents say (in fact) “this ceasefire puts a complete end to the fighting” without a ceasefire deadline, then the duration of the ceasefire is set in the sense that no resumption of fighting is allowed at any time. Thus, the Korean ceasefire agreement calls for a “ceasefire and ceasefire” and aims to “achieve a ceasefire that guarantees a complete cessation of hostilities and all armed acts in Korea until a definitive peaceful solution is found.  I remember reading (not sure where, I think it was the preliminary version) that the way the mage charr considers is that they distrust magic users in general because of the problem of the legion of flames, but they are also very pragmatic, so they will not stop using magic completely everywhere , because it would be an advantage they give to their enemies So magic is mainly something they tolerate, but they don`t really encourage. In fact, I think Rytlock Brimstone is a good example, he might be wary of magic, but his weapon of choice is a magic sword, and one with fire-based magic.